to use

At the learning of using something,
I am getting used to it meanwhile.

NGO

NGO, non-governmental organization.

"NGO" implies that there IS a gonernment.
Only by the existence of a government would there be NGO.

People do ask why there is a government doing governing,
people do ask what function a government serves,
and people do ask how a government should be.
However, rare do people ask why there is a NGO,
at what scale the NGOs work, and why do we need NGOs other than a government.

Providing that NGOs are much more closer to the "original position" than a governmental fact,
it seems easy for people to take NGOs for granted.
But maybe, NGOs, other than a uniting Big Brother, reveal a reality of pluralism.

For I just said to Ben that none of the ideal models of a state,
such as "Respubica," "Utophia," is consistent with pluralism,
I have to point out that NGOs might stand for pluralism nearly perfect.
A civil society could be without a government but a government could never be without a civil society,
unless there's no different interests between every single individual in the country it governs.

By a negative definition, a NGO is "what is not,"
not "what is."

Interesting. A substance with more realization is so
defined BY another
less realized stuff.

It is the government that can not be without a outer
society,not the civil society that can not be without an
authority among.

For the government governs by simplified the whole
reality of the people,
while the civil society simply presents it.

a Tampax joke

As we know, Tampax is kinda a synonym to tampon.

And below is what a male friend just told me:

the reason i remember it so clearly is because as an avid watcher russian tv
program, Tampax's commercial appeared a lot on russian programs,
at first i didn't know what it was,
but the name tampax stayed in my memory very deeply
[those who made the commercial succeeded in instilling product image]
and i happened to go to russia - moscow with my mom, and what do you know,
I saw boxes of tampaxes in store, and the moment i saw i told my mom
"mom, mom, tampax, tampax",
which must've embarrassed her very much, but the saleslady
calmly said "you don't need that" to me.

The limitation

You are what you think you are.

You are the only limitation.

The sky is not the limitation when
you're not expecting yourself to touch the sky.
Only when you are, the sky is the limitation

die Kinder

I don't really view them as kids.

They're human beings, just lesser experienced.

"Kids" are talking animals, yet we are even.

Fierce

The nervous mix your passion, end up a fierce.

yet the fierce itself could be interpreted to be good.

passionate, it has to be.

what life is like

1.Life is a piece of shit. And we flies lick on it.

2.Life is like a midget, funny looked, miserable embodied.

Hatred

At where people fear too much, hatred grows.

Please do not play hard

Please do not play hard .
Play should be for fun.
just do the play and letgo those which are not for fun only,
then you're playing.

Smile, or laugh, we're playing.

Letting go

Jason was quite right about that I can easily letgo not only those relatively

minor events in my life but also those plays a great role.

seemingly that there's nothing in my life that worth caring or I just do not,

might not, don't know what to, and would not care.


You said that an elder told y'all that a difference between the both genders

is that men has an ABILITY to leave. Then I said that I must be a man.

I guess I can leave.

It not because that I care not; it is that I'm ABLE to letgo.

Then I found it today that what I may never letgo are those

massive social problems.

Hard to define

As it goes to topics such as "Life is...." and "Liebe ist ....,"

whenever we asks for a definition, an interpretation is casted.

It's too hard to define.

of both epistmelogical and recognitive

1.How could we believe in those we are able to prove to be fallible?

2.How could we reason what we believe in to be fallible?

3.Is it psychologically possible for a person willing to prove what he believes to be false?

4.If it is 3., what is the motive for people to do this? Or it just happens coincidently?

5.If it is not 3., how is there any revolution of ideas?

I don't think much of modern ecomonics

Because modern economics is nothing more than model economics.
It provides a reduced principle to explain one single phenomenon,
then keeps adding adherent principles to make that overreduced prime principle work.
Economics was meant to explain the phenomenon, not itself.

Wishful thinking

I found it today that I am not a person who processes anymore wishful thinking.

I don't believe in the eudaimonian formula of happiness or blessing.
I do not know how to believe in this.
I have lost this ability to imagine an analogy to a benevolent God that really judges.

Though life is cruel, it could still be taken as a gift,
which we could not have it ourselves nor experience without.
The main reason for me to live a life is to experience.
Not only to experience life itself;
but also to experience the experience itself,
which we are not able to do without this bodily existence.

Thank God, if there is one, not for the blessing through our lives
but for the lives that I have not done anything that deserves it.

Forever

We wake up everyday.

But we won't wake up everyday.

We thought things goes on everyday,

however, nothing goes on everyday.

What forever exists only in our expectations,

while the expector gone, the eternities once expected left, ever forever.

Salsa baby

Hey, Salsa baby, may you Salsa for me?

You've just beat me with my heart beating.

Would you be my Salsa baby?

Would I like to hold your hand a gain?


Ohh mine! You the Latino Salsa baby, I beg you to letgo me.

Reluctant

People are reluctant to realize what they don't believe,
which most of them are those people are not dared to face to be true.

D'you know this person?

Can we ever KNOW a person without acknowledging his name?
Can we ever KNOW a person without finding his / her gender?
Can we ever KNOW a person without seeing her age?

What if you've been talking to such a person every morning on the bus
and know his attitude toward religion, his viewpoints of marriage,
his dream and his plan of career, what he has been enthusiastic about.
D'you know this person?

Providing that you knew a friend on web,
talk with him everything could,
know his everything might,
but his name and face, some basic clue to identify a person.
While the friend was murdered, the police came to you because of his cookies.
Can you tell the police that you know this person but not sure that he is with
a name or a face as such? Can you?

How do we define that we know somebody?
What is the necessary condition to assert knowing a person?
Is knowing the name or can recognize by the voice or face necessary?
Does personality matter at knowing a person?



Can we just love blindly?

Another Matter of Degree

It is possible, when we won't be surprised by this event because of the breaking of natural law;
it is probable, when we assume this event reasonable to happen;
it is plausible, when we found some intention for this event to happen;
it is practicable, when we are apt to make this event happen and excitingly found ways might;
it is pragmaticable, when we wish the happening of this event to enable those we expected.

prank me

I don't want to make up;
nor do I want to dress up,
to become what I am not.

For beauty,
that would not be a good reason to prink up;
for courtesy,
that a dress on I might put.

Prank me didn't wear in pink,
because that's what I think,
not to snide the queer,
just this colour so weird.

just found

"Maybe it's not a person we fall in love with so much as a distance,
a depth which that particular person happens to embody.
Perhaps it's some inconsolable quality in that person,
some unappeasable dimension, that attracts one all the more forcibly."

by Gustaf Sobin

So true.

A Prograssive View over Life

1.Finish those you can and try those you can not.

2.Try to keep being your best self ever but need not to be harsh.

3.Not to do as what you want yourself to be but what you want yourself want to become.

4.Learning can be some parody, yet a parody has something worth learning as well as its side-effect.

5.Prefer overworked than to overact.

6.You are fine 'till beaten. So keep fighting even injured.

7.Be fundamental on your goal.

What if I love you?

"What if I love you?" I asked, not you, but myself, many years ago.
The Gegenstehen had gone away and I had been awake.
After that, I had been in 2 relationships, and them too, that blow away.

'Till the day I dreamed about people seem to be far from my life and my mind,
the state of dream revealed every hidden feeling deep in me,
that nobody knows, not even myself.
"What if I love you still?" so I ask myself, still.
I can know the feelings only when the reason cease to work;
and now I know but have nothing to do with.

Smile, always smile.